Marine artificial reef (MAR) interference in artisanal fisheries in Brazil: use of traditional knowledge
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20950/1678-2305/bip.2022.48.e661Keywords:
artisanal fishermen;, local knowledge;, submerged reefs;, fishery management;, southeastern Brazil.Abstract
The aim of this study was to describe the traditional knowledge from artisanal fishermen related to marine artificial reef (MAR) ship Victory 8B and to identify possible changes in the fishery area after its installation. We performed single ethnographic interviews (n = 80) through a semistructured questionnaire, using participant observation, visual ethnography, and field diary recordings. All the interviewees were men from 27 to 77 years old, with low education levels and up to 60 years of experience in the fishery artisanal. Most of the interviewees (n = 71; 88.7%) recognize the presence of this MAR in the region and its role as a shelter for marine fauna and an attractor for species with commercial value. Even with fishery prohibition in the vicinity of MAR Victory 8B, most of the interviewees (n = 75; 93.7%) reported the practice in that area. According to the fishermen, the ship installation did not alter area the fishery, but the structure positively changed the activity by attracting more fish, increasing capture and profits. With that, from the perspective of the fishermen perception, MAR Victory 8B fulfilled its role in the enrichment of the fish stock and the conservation of marine biodiversity in the region.
References
Abreu, J.S.; Domit, C.; Zappes, C.A. 2017. Is there dialogue between researchers and traditional community members? The importance of integration between traditional knowledge and scientiï¬Âc knowledge to coastal management. Ocean & Coastal Management, 141: 10-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.03.003.
Abreu, J.S.; Di Beneditto, A.P.M.; Martins, A.S.; Zappes, C.A. 2020 Pesca artesanal no município de Guarapari, estado do Espírito Santo: Uma abordagem sobre a percepção de pescadores que atuam na pesca de pequena escala. Sociedade & Natureza, 32: 59-74. https://doi.org/10.14393/SN-v32-2020-46923.
Abreu, J.S.; Oliveira, R.G.; Zappes, C.A. 2021. Interferência do turismo nap esca artisanal: uma abordagem da oceanografia socioambiental no sudeste do Brasil. Revista de Geografia, 38(1): 330-346. https://doi.org/10.51359/2238-6211.2021.246190.
Albuquerque, U.P.; Cunha, L.V.C.; Lucena, R.F.P.; Alves, R.R.N. 2014. Methods and Techniques in Etnobiology and Etnoecology. New York Heidelberg Dordrecht London. 560p.
Amaral, A.C.Z.; Jablonski, S. 2005. Conservation of Marine and Coastal Biodiversity in Brazil. Conservation Biology, 19(3): 625-631.
Alegretti, C.B.; Grande, H.; Namiki, C.A.P.; Loose, R.H.; Brandini, F.P. 2021. A preliminary assessment of larval fish assemblages on artificial reefs in the nearshore Southern Brazil. Ocean and Coastal Research, 69: 1-20. http://doi.org/10.1590/2675-2824069.21-002cba.
Bailey, K.D. 1982. Methods of Social Research. 2nd ed. New York: McMillan Publishers, The Free Press, 277p.
Batiste, V.S.; Fabré, N.N.; Malhado A.C.M.; Ladle, R.J. 2014. Tropical artisanal coastal fisheries: challenges and future directions. Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture, 22(1): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641262.2013.822463.
Bavinck, M. 2001. Understanding fisheries conflicts in the south - a legal pluralist perspective. Society & Natural Resources, 18(9): 805-820. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920500205491.
Bohnsack, J.A.; Sutherland, D.L. 1985. Artificial Reef Research: a review with recommendations for future priorities. Bulletin of Marine Science, 37(1): 11-39.
Brasil. 2015. Lei Federal n° 13.123 de 20 de maio de 2015. Regulamenta o inciso II do § 1o e o § 4o do art. 225 da Constituição Federal, o Artigo 1, a alínea j do Artigo 8, a alínea c do Artigo 10, o Artigo 15 e os §§ 3º e 4º do Artigo 16 da Convenção sobre Diversidade Biológica, promulgada pelo Decreto no 2.519, de 16 de março de 1998; dispõe sobre o acesso ao patrimônio genético, sobre a proteção e o acesso ao conhecimento tradicional associado e sobre a repartição de benefícios para conservação e uso sustentável da biodiversidade; revoga a Medida Provisória nº 2.186-16, de 23 de agosto de 2001; e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, 21 de maio de 2015, Seção 1: p.1.
Carral, L.; Alvarez-Feal, L.C.; Tarrio-Saavedra, J.; Guerreiro, M.L.R.; Fraguela, J.A. 2018. Social interest in developing a green modular artificial reef structure in concrete for the ecosystems of the Galician rías. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172: 1881-1898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.252.
Cardoso, A.P.LP.; Matos, M.R.S.B.C.; Rosa, R.S.; Alvarado, F.; Medeiros, A.P.M.; Santos, B.A. 2020. Increased fish diversity over day and night in structurally complex habitats of artificial reefs. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 522: 152244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2019.151244.
Costa, E.S.; Andrade, R.R.; Junior, L.B.; Gaigher, L.P.; Oliveira, C.M.S.; Junior, C.D.; Neto, R.R. 2014. Controls on temporal and spatial variation of nutrients in a tropical marine artificial reef: the case of the Victory 8B on the Southeastern Brazilian Coast. Revista Virtual de Química, 6(4): 834-843. https://doi.org/10.5935/1984-6835.20140051.
Diogo, H.; Veiga, P.; Pita, C.; Sousa, A.; Lima, D.; Pereira, J.G.; Gonçalves, J.M.S; Erzini, K., Rangel, M. 2020. Marine recreational fishing in Portugal: current knowledge, challenges, and future perspectives. Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture, 28(4): 536-560. https://doi.org/10.1080/23308249.2020.1777083.
Espinoza, C.; Gallardo,V.A.; Merino, C.; Pizarro, P.; Liu, K.M. 2020. Sustainability of the artisanal fishery in Northern Chile: a case study of Caleta Pisagua. Sustainability, 12(18): 72-90. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187290.
FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2012. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2012. FAO, Rome, Italy, 230p.
Floeter, S.R.; Krohling, W.; Gasparini, J.L.; Ferreira, C.E.L.; Zalmon, I.R. 2007. Reef fish community structure on coastal islands of the southeastern Brazil: the influence of exposure and benthic cover. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 78: 147-160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-006-9084-6.
Folpp, H.R.; Schilling, H.T.; Clark, G.F.; Lowry,M.B.; Maslen, B.; Gregson, M.; Suthers, M. 2020. Artificial reefs increase fish abundance in habitat-limited estuaries. Journal of Applied Ecology, 57(9): 1752-1761. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13666.
Harrison, S.; Rousseau, M. 2020. Comparison of artificial and natural reef productivity in Nantucket Sound, MA, USA. Estuaries and Coasts, 43: 2092-2105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-020-00749-6.
Hylkema,A.; Hakkaart, Q.C.A.; Reid, C.B.; Osinga,R.; Murk,A.J.; Debrot, A.O. 2021. Artificial reefs in the Caribbean: a need for comprehensive monitoring and integration into marine management plans. Ocean & Coastal Management, 209: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105672.
IBAMA. 2009. Instrução Normativa n. 22, de 10 de julho de 2009. Dispõe sobre o licenciamento ambiental para instalação de recifes artiï¬Âciais no Mar Territorial na Zona Econômica Exclusiva brasileiros. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, 13 de julho de 2009, nº 22. Seção 1: p.87.
IBGE - Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. 2021. Cidades e Estados. Guarapari. Available at: <https://www.ibge.gov.br/cidades-e-estados/es/guarapari.html>. Accessed: Feb. 20, 2021.
Jayanthi, M; Edward, J.P.; Malleshappa, H.; Asir, N.G.G.; Mathews, G.; Raj, K.D.; Bilgi, D.S.; Kumar, T.K.A.; Sannasiraj, S.A. 2019. Perforated trapezoidal artificial reefs can augment the benefits of restoration of an island and its marine ecosystem. Restoration Ecology, 28(1): 233-243. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13041.
Leão, Z.M.A.N.; Kikuchi, R.K.P.; Testa, V. 2003. Corals and coral reefs of Brazil. Coral Reefs.. In: J. Cortés, (ed.). Latin America Coral Reefs. Elsevier Science: Amsterdam, pp.9-52.
Lima, J.S.; Zappes, C.A.; Di Beneditto, A.P.M.; Zalmon, I.R. 2018. Artisanal ï¬Âsheries and artiï¬Âcial reefs on the southeast coast of Brazil: Contributions to research and management. Ocean & Coastal Management, 163: 372-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.07.018.
Lima, J.S.; Zappes, C.A.; Di Beneditto, A.P.M.; Zalmon, I.R. 2019. Ethnoecology and socioeconomic around an artificial reef: the case of artisanal
fisheries from southeastern Brazil. Biota Neotropica, 19(2): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1590/1676-0611-BN-2018-0620.
Lima, J.S.; Sanchez-Jerez, P.; Santos, L.N.; Zalmon, I.R. 2020. Could artificial reefs increase access to estuarine fishery resources? Insights from a long-term assessment. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 242(5): 106858-106870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2020.106858.
Malinowski, B. 2014. Argonauts of the Western Pacific. 1st ed., Routledge Publisher online. 562p.
Martindale, R.C.; Holstein, D.; Knowlton, N.; Voss, J.D.; Weiss, A.M.; Correa, A.M.S. 2021. Editorial: Gulf of Mexico Reefs: Past, Present and Future. Frontiers in Marine Science, 8: 713058. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.713058.
Martins, A.S.; Santos, L.B.; Pizetta, G.T.; Monjardim, C.; Doxsey, J.R. 2009. Interdisciplinary assessment of the status quo of the marine ï¬Âshery systems in the state of Espirito Santo, Brazil, using Rapï¬Âsh. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 25(3): 269-276. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2009.01305.x.
Maruyama, L.S.; Castro, P.M.G.; Paiva, P.P. 2009 Pesca artesanal no médio e baixo Tietê, São Paulo, Brasil: Aspectos estruturais e socioeconômicos. Boletim Instituto de Pesca, 35(1): 61-81.
Mason, M., 2010. Sample Size and Saturation in PhD Studies Using Qualitative Interviews. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 11(3): 1-19. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-11.3.1428.
Mazzocchi, F. 2006. Western science and traditional knowledge. EMBO Reports, 7: 463-466.
Milanez, B. 2015. Dialogues between social and natural sciences: contribution to the debate on socio-environmental conflicts. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 87(4): 2335-2348. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201520140724.
Miranda, T.M.; Amorozo, M.C.M.; Govone, J.S.; Daniela, M.M. 2007. The influence of visual stimuli in ethnobotanical data collection using the listing task method. Field Methods, 19(1): 76-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X06295987.
Mulalap, C.Y.; Frere, T.; Huffer, E.; Hviding, E.; Paul, K.; Smith, Dr., A.; Vierros, M.K. 2020. Traditional knowledge and the BBNJ instrument. Marine Policy, 122:104103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104103.
Murray, G.; Neis, B.; Johnsen, J.P. 2006. Lessons learned from reconstructing interactions between local ecological knowledge, fisheries science, and fisheries management in the commercial fisheries of Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. Human Ecology, 34: 549-571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-006-9010-8 .
Musiello-Fernandes, J.; Zappes, C.A.; Hostim-Silva, M. 2017. Small-scale shrimp fisheries on the Brazilian coast: Stakeholders perceptions of the closed season and integrated management. Ocean & Coastal Management, 148: 89-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.07.018.
Musiello-Fernandes, J.; Oliveira, P.C.; Abreu, J.S.; Di Beneditto, A.P.M.; Braga, A.A.; Hostim-Silva, M.; Zappes, C.A. 2020. Artisanal Fishing on the coast of Espírito Santo state, Southeastern Brazil: an approach to Socioenvironmental Oceanography. Boletim do Instituto de Pesca, 46(4): e610. https://doi.org/10.20950/1678-2305.2020.46.4.610.
NRC - National Research Council. 1993. Managing Wastewater in Coastal Urban Areas. Washington: National Academy Press. 478p.
Opdenakker, R. 2006. Advantages and disadvantages of four interview techniques in qualitative research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung = Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 7(4): art. 11-. Available at: <https://pure.tue.nl/ws/files/1948695/Metis202565.pdf>. Accessed: Mar. 12, 2021.
Padilha, R.A.; Henkes, J.A. 2012. A utilização de recifes artificiais marinhos como ferramenta de recuperação da fauna marinha. Revista Gestão & Sustentabilidade Ambiental, 1(1): 41-73. https://doi.org/10.19177/rgsa.v1e1201241-73.
Pickering, H.; Whitmarsh, D. 1996. Artificial reefs and fisheries exploitation: a review of the "attraction versus production†debate, the influence of design and its significance for policy. Fisheries Research, 31(1-2): 39-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-7836(97)00019-2.
Ravesteijn, W.; He, J.; Chen, C. 2014. Responsible innovation and stakeholder management in infrastructures: the Nansha Port Railway Project. Ocean & Coastal Management, 100: 1-9.
Regan, H.M.; Colyvan, M. 2000. Fuzzy sets and threatened species classification. Conservation Biology, 14(4): 1197-1199.
Rousseau, M.A. 2008. Massachusetts Marine Artificial Reef Plan. Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries, Departament of Fish and Game, Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs, Commonwealth of Massachusetts. 69p. Available at: <http://programsandprojects/artficial_reef_policy.pdf>. Accessed: May 10, 2020.
Ryan, G.; Bernard, H.R. 2000. Data management and analysis methods. In: Denzin, N.K.; Lincoln, Y.S. (ed.). Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage Publications. pp. 769-802.
Scarcella, G.; Grati, F.; Bolognini, L.; Domenichetti, F.; Malaspina, S.; Manoukian, S.; Polidori, P.; Spagnolo, A.; Fabi, G. 2015. Time-series analyses of fish abundance from an artificial reef and a reference area in the central-Adriatic Sea. Journal Applied Ichthyolgy, 31(53): 74-85. https://doi.org/10.1111/jai.12952.
Schensul, S.L.; Schensul, J.J.; Lecompte, M.D. 1999. Essential Ethnographic Methods: Observations, Interviews and Questionnaires. Altamira Press, Walnut Creek, 318p.
Seaman, W.Jr., 2000. Artificial Reef Evaluation with Application to Natural Marine Habitats. CRC Press, Florida, 260p.
Seaman, W.JR.; Sprague, L.M. 1991. Artificial Habitats for Marine and Freshwater Fisheries. Academic Press, San Diego, EUA, 258p.
Seixas, L.B.; Barreto, N.R.; Santos, L.N. 2013. Artiï¬Âcial reefs for marine and freshwater ï¬Âsh management Brazil: researchers proï¬Âle and academic production over the 19902010 period. Oecologia Australis, 17(3): 374-385. http://dx.doi.org/10.4257/oeco.2013.1703.05.
Spalding, M.; Burke, L.; Wood, S.; Ashpole, J.; Hutchison, J.; Emagassen, P. 2017. Mapping the global value and distribution of coral reef tourism. Marine Police, 2: 104-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.05.014.
Stephen, C.D.; Dansby, B.G.; Osburn, H.R.; Matlock, G.C.; Riechers, R.K.; Rayburn, R. 1989. Texas Artificial Reef Fishery Management Plan. Fishery Management Plan Series, nº 3. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Coastal Fisheries Branch, 26p. Available at: <https://tpwd.texas.gov/publications/pwdpubs/media/pwd_pl_v3400_0332.pdf>. Accessed: Nov. 21, 2016.
Toleto, M.I.; Torres, P.; Díaz, C.; Zamora, V.; López, J.; Olivares, G. 2020. Ecological succession of benthic organisms on niche-type artificial reefs. Ecological Processes, 9(38): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-020-00242-9.
Truchet, D.M.; Noceti, M.B. 2021. Small-Scale Artisanal Fishers and Socio-environmental Conflicts in Estuarine and Coastal Wetlands. In: Fiori S.M.; Pratolongo P.D. (eds). The Bahía Blanca Estuary. Springer, Cham, pp.493-519. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66486-2_18.
Vivier, B.; Dauvin, J.C.; Navon, M.; Rusig, A.M.; Mussio, I.; Orvain, F.; Boutouil, M.; Claquin, P. 2021. Marine artificial reefs, a meta-analysis of their design, objectives and effectiveness. Global Ecology and Conservation, 27: e01538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01538.
Wang, Z.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, S.; Wang, K.; Zhao, J.; Xu, Q. 2015. A comparative study of ï¬Âsh assemblages near aquaculture, artiï¬Âcial and natural habitats Journal of Ocean University of China, 14(3): 1-12.
Whitmarsh, D.; Santos, M.N.; Ramos, J.; Monteiro, C.C. 2008. Marine habitat modification through artificial reefs off the Algarve (Southern Portugal): an economic analysis of the fisheries and the prospects for management. Ocean & Coastal Management, 51(6): 463-468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2008.04.004.
Yeasmin, S.; Rahman, K.F. 2012. 'Triangulation' Research Method as the Tool of Social Science Research. BUP Journal, 1(1): 154-163.
Zappes, C.A.; Oliveira, P.C.; Di Beneditto, A.P.M. 2016. Percepção de pescadores no Norte Fluminense sobre a viabilidade da pesca artesanal com a implantação de megaempreendimento portuário. Boletim do Instituto de Pesca, 42(1): 73-88. https://doi.org/10.5007/1678-2305.2016v42n1p73.
Abreu, J.S.; Di Beneditto, A.P.M.; Martins, A.S.; Zappes, C.A. 2020 Pesca artesanal no município de Guarapari, estado do Espírito Santo: Uma abordagem sobre a percepção de pescadores que atuam na pesca de pequena escala. Sociedade & Natureza, 32: 59-74. https://doi.org/10.14393/SN-v32-2020-46923.
Abreu, J.S.; Oliveira, R.G.; Zappes, C.A. 2021. Interferência do turismo nap esca artisanal: uma abordagem da oceanografia socioambiental no sudeste do Brasil. Revista de Geografia, 38(1): 330-346. https://doi.org/10.51359/2238-6211.2021.246190.
Albuquerque, U.P.; Cunha, L.V.C.; Lucena, R.F.P.; Alves, R.R.N. 2014. Methods and Techniques in Etnobiology and Etnoecology. New York Heidelberg Dordrecht London. 560p.
Amaral, A.C.Z.; Jablonski, S. 2005. Conservation of Marine and Coastal Biodiversity in Brazil. Conservation Biology, 19(3): 625-631.
Alegretti, C.B.; Grande, H.; Namiki, C.A.P.; Loose, R.H.; Brandini, F.P. 2021. A preliminary assessment of larval fish assemblages on artificial reefs in the nearshore Southern Brazil. Ocean and Coastal Research, 69: 1-20. http://doi.org/10.1590/2675-2824069.21-002cba.
Bailey, K.D. 1982. Methods of Social Research. 2nd ed. New York: McMillan Publishers, The Free Press, 277p.
Batiste, V.S.; Fabré, N.N.; Malhado A.C.M.; Ladle, R.J. 2014. Tropical artisanal coastal fisheries: challenges and future directions. Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture, 22(1): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641262.2013.822463.
Bavinck, M. 2001. Understanding fisheries conflicts in the south - a legal pluralist perspective. Society & Natural Resources, 18(9): 805-820. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920500205491.
Bohnsack, J.A.; Sutherland, D.L. 1985. Artificial Reef Research: a review with recommendations for future priorities. Bulletin of Marine Science, 37(1): 11-39.
Brasil. 2015. Lei Federal n° 13.123 de 20 de maio de 2015. Regulamenta o inciso II do § 1o e o § 4o do art. 225 da Constituição Federal, o Artigo 1, a alínea j do Artigo 8, a alínea c do Artigo 10, o Artigo 15 e os §§ 3º e 4º do Artigo 16 da Convenção sobre Diversidade Biológica, promulgada pelo Decreto no 2.519, de 16 de março de 1998; dispõe sobre o acesso ao patrimônio genético, sobre a proteção e o acesso ao conhecimento tradicional associado e sobre a repartição de benefícios para conservação e uso sustentável da biodiversidade; revoga a Medida Provisória nº 2.186-16, de 23 de agosto de 2001; e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, 21 de maio de 2015, Seção 1: p.1.
Carral, L.; Alvarez-Feal, L.C.; Tarrio-Saavedra, J.; Guerreiro, M.L.R.; Fraguela, J.A. 2018. Social interest in developing a green modular artificial reef structure in concrete for the ecosystems of the Galician rías. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172: 1881-1898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.252.
Cardoso, A.P.LP.; Matos, M.R.S.B.C.; Rosa, R.S.; Alvarado, F.; Medeiros, A.P.M.; Santos, B.A. 2020. Increased fish diversity over day and night in structurally complex habitats of artificial reefs. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 522: 152244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2019.151244.
Costa, E.S.; Andrade, R.R.; Junior, L.B.; Gaigher, L.P.; Oliveira, C.M.S.; Junior, C.D.; Neto, R.R. 2014. Controls on temporal and spatial variation of nutrients in a tropical marine artificial reef: the case of the Victory 8B on the Southeastern Brazilian Coast. Revista Virtual de Química, 6(4): 834-843. https://doi.org/10.5935/1984-6835.20140051.
Diogo, H.; Veiga, P.; Pita, C.; Sousa, A.; Lima, D.; Pereira, J.G.; Gonçalves, J.M.S; Erzini, K., Rangel, M. 2020. Marine recreational fishing in Portugal: current knowledge, challenges, and future perspectives. Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture, 28(4): 536-560. https://doi.org/10.1080/23308249.2020.1777083.
Espinoza, C.; Gallardo,V.A.; Merino, C.; Pizarro, P.; Liu, K.M. 2020. Sustainability of the artisanal fishery in Northern Chile: a case study of Caleta Pisagua. Sustainability, 12(18): 72-90. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187290.
FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2012. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2012. FAO, Rome, Italy, 230p.
Floeter, S.R.; Krohling, W.; Gasparini, J.L.; Ferreira, C.E.L.; Zalmon, I.R. 2007. Reef fish community structure on coastal islands of the southeastern Brazil: the influence of exposure and benthic cover. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 78: 147-160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-006-9084-6.
Folpp, H.R.; Schilling, H.T.; Clark, G.F.; Lowry,M.B.; Maslen, B.; Gregson, M.; Suthers, M. 2020. Artificial reefs increase fish abundance in habitat-limited estuaries. Journal of Applied Ecology, 57(9): 1752-1761. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13666.
Harrison, S.; Rousseau, M. 2020. Comparison of artificial and natural reef productivity in Nantucket Sound, MA, USA. Estuaries and Coasts, 43: 2092-2105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-020-00749-6.
Hylkema,A.; Hakkaart, Q.C.A.; Reid, C.B.; Osinga,R.; Murk,A.J.; Debrot, A.O. 2021. Artificial reefs in the Caribbean: a need for comprehensive monitoring and integration into marine management plans. Ocean & Coastal Management, 209: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105672.
IBAMA. 2009. Instrução Normativa n. 22, de 10 de julho de 2009. Dispõe sobre o licenciamento ambiental para instalação de recifes artiï¬Âciais no Mar Territorial na Zona Econômica Exclusiva brasileiros. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, 13 de julho de 2009, nº 22. Seção 1: p.87.
IBGE - Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. 2021. Cidades e Estados. Guarapari. Available at: <https://www.ibge.gov.br/cidades-e-estados/es/guarapari.html>. Accessed: Feb. 20, 2021.
Jayanthi, M; Edward, J.P.; Malleshappa, H.; Asir, N.G.G.; Mathews, G.; Raj, K.D.; Bilgi, D.S.; Kumar, T.K.A.; Sannasiraj, S.A. 2019. Perforated trapezoidal artificial reefs can augment the benefits of restoration of an island and its marine ecosystem. Restoration Ecology, 28(1): 233-243. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13041.
Leão, Z.M.A.N.; Kikuchi, R.K.P.; Testa, V. 2003. Corals and coral reefs of Brazil. Coral Reefs.. In: J. Cortés, (ed.). Latin America Coral Reefs. Elsevier Science: Amsterdam, pp.9-52.
Lima, J.S.; Zappes, C.A.; Di Beneditto, A.P.M.; Zalmon, I.R. 2018. Artisanal ï¬Âsheries and artiï¬Âcial reefs on the southeast coast of Brazil: Contributions to research and management. Ocean & Coastal Management, 163: 372-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.07.018.
Lima, J.S.; Zappes, C.A.; Di Beneditto, A.P.M.; Zalmon, I.R. 2019. Ethnoecology and socioeconomic around an artificial reef: the case of artisanal
fisheries from southeastern Brazil. Biota Neotropica, 19(2): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1590/1676-0611-BN-2018-0620.
Lima, J.S.; Sanchez-Jerez, P.; Santos, L.N.; Zalmon, I.R. 2020. Could artificial reefs increase access to estuarine fishery resources? Insights from a long-term assessment. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 242(5): 106858-106870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2020.106858.
Malinowski, B. 2014. Argonauts of the Western Pacific. 1st ed., Routledge Publisher online. 562p.
Martindale, R.C.; Holstein, D.; Knowlton, N.; Voss, J.D.; Weiss, A.M.; Correa, A.M.S. 2021. Editorial: Gulf of Mexico Reefs: Past, Present and Future. Frontiers in Marine Science, 8: 713058. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.713058.
Martins, A.S.; Santos, L.B.; Pizetta, G.T.; Monjardim, C.; Doxsey, J.R. 2009. Interdisciplinary assessment of the status quo of the marine ï¬Âshery systems in the state of Espirito Santo, Brazil, using Rapï¬Âsh. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 25(3): 269-276. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2009.01305.x.
Maruyama, L.S.; Castro, P.M.G.; Paiva, P.P. 2009 Pesca artesanal no médio e baixo Tietê, São Paulo, Brasil: Aspectos estruturais e socioeconômicos. Boletim Instituto de Pesca, 35(1): 61-81.
Mason, M., 2010. Sample Size and Saturation in PhD Studies Using Qualitative Interviews. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 11(3): 1-19. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-11.3.1428.
Mazzocchi, F. 2006. Western science and traditional knowledge. EMBO Reports, 7: 463-466.
Milanez, B. 2015. Dialogues between social and natural sciences: contribution to the debate on socio-environmental conflicts. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 87(4): 2335-2348. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201520140724.
Miranda, T.M.; Amorozo, M.C.M.; Govone, J.S.; Daniela, M.M. 2007. The influence of visual stimuli in ethnobotanical data collection using the listing task method. Field Methods, 19(1): 76-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X06295987.
Mulalap, C.Y.; Frere, T.; Huffer, E.; Hviding, E.; Paul, K.; Smith, Dr., A.; Vierros, M.K. 2020. Traditional knowledge and the BBNJ instrument. Marine Policy, 122:104103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104103.
Murray, G.; Neis, B.; Johnsen, J.P. 2006. Lessons learned from reconstructing interactions between local ecological knowledge, fisheries science, and fisheries management in the commercial fisheries of Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. Human Ecology, 34: 549-571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-006-9010-8 .
Musiello-Fernandes, J.; Zappes, C.A.; Hostim-Silva, M. 2017. Small-scale shrimp fisheries on the Brazilian coast: Stakeholders perceptions of the closed season and integrated management. Ocean & Coastal Management, 148: 89-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.07.018.
Musiello-Fernandes, J.; Oliveira, P.C.; Abreu, J.S.; Di Beneditto, A.P.M.; Braga, A.A.; Hostim-Silva, M.; Zappes, C.A. 2020. Artisanal Fishing on the coast of Espírito Santo state, Southeastern Brazil: an approach to Socioenvironmental Oceanography. Boletim do Instituto de Pesca, 46(4): e610. https://doi.org/10.20950/1678-2305.2020.46.4.610.
NRC - National Research Council. 1993. Managing Wastewater in Coastal Urban Areas. Washington: National Academy Press. 478p.
Opdenakker, R. 2006. Advantages and disadvantages of four interview techniques in qualitative research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung = Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 7(4): art. 11-. Available at: <https://pure.tue.nl/ws/files/1948695/Metis202565.pdf>. Accessed: Mar. 12, 2021.
Padilha, R.A.; Henkes, J.A. 2012. A utilização de recifes artificiais marinhos como ferramenta de recuperação da fauna marinha. Revista Gestão & Sustentabilidade Ambiental, 1(1): 41-73. https://doi.org/10.19177/rgsa.v1e1201241-73.
Pickering, H.; Whitmarsh, D. 1996. Artificial reefs and fisheries exploitation: a review of the "attraction versus production†debate, the influence of design and its significance for policy. Fisheries Research, 31(1-2): 39-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-7836(97)00019-2.
Ravesteijn, W.; He, J.; Chen, C. 2014. Responsible innovation and stakeholder management in infrastructures: the Nansha Port Railway Project. Ocean & Coastal Management, 100: 1-9.
Regan, H.M.; Colyvan, M. 2000. Fuzzy sets and threatened species classification. Conservation Biology, 14(4): 1197-1199.
Rousseau, M.A. 2008. Massachusetts Marine Artificial Reef Plan. Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries, Departament of Fish and Game, Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs, Commonwealth of Massachusetts. 69p. Available at: <http://programsandprojects/artficial_reef_policy.pdf>. Accessed: May 10, 2020.
Ryan, G.; Bernard, H.R. 2000. Data management and analysis methods. In: Denzin, N.K.; Lincoln, Y.S. (ed.). Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage Publications. pp. 769-802.
Scarcella, G.; Grati, F.; Bolognini, L.; Domenichetti, F.; Malaspina, S.; Manoukian, S.; Polidori, P.; Spagnolo, A.; Fabi, G. 2015. Time-series analyses of fish abundance from an artificial reef and a reference area in the central-Adriatic Sea. Journal Applied Ichthyolgy, 31(53): 74-85. https://doi.org/10.1111/jai.12952.
Schensul, S.L.; Schensul, J.J.; Lecompte, M.D. 1999. Essential Ethnographic Methods: Observations, Interviews and Questionnaires. Altamira Press, Walnut Creek, 318p.
Seaman, W.Jr., 2000. Artificial Reef Evaluation with Application to Natural Marine Habitats. CRC Press, Florida, 260p.
Seaman, W.JR.; Sprague, L.M. 1991. Artificial Habitats for Marine and Freshwater Fisheries. Academic Press, San Diego, EUA, 258p.
Seixas, L.B.; Barreto, N.R.; Santos, L.N. 2013. Artiï¬Âcial reefs for marine and freshwater ï¬Âsh management Brazil: researchers proï¬Âle and academic production over the 19902010 period. Oecologia Australis, 17(3): 374-385. http://dx.doi.org/10.4257/oeco.2013.1703.05.
Spalding, M.; Burke, L.; Wood, S.; Ashpole, J.; Hutchison, J.; Emagassen, P. 2017. Mapping the global value and distribution of coral reef tourism. Marine Police, 2: 104-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.05.014.
Stephen, C.D.; Dansby, B.G.; Osburn, H.R.; Matlock, G.C.; Riechers, R.K.; Rayburn, R. 1989. Texas Artificial Reef Fishery Management Plan. Fishery Management Plan Series, nº 3. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Coastal Fisheries Branch, 26p. Available at: <https://tpwd.texas.gov/publications/pwdpubs/media/pwd_pl_v3400_0332.pdf>. Accessed: Nov. 21, 2016.
Toleto, M.I.; Torres, P.; Díaz, C.; Zamora, V.; López, J.; Olivares, G. 2020. Ecological succession of benthic organisms on niche-type artificial reefs. Ecological Processes, 9(38): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-020-00242-9.
Truchet, D.M.; Noceti, M.B. 2021. Small-Scale Artisanal Fishers and Socio-environmental Conflicts in Estuarine and Coastal Wetlands. In: Fiori S.M.; Pratolongo P.D. (eds). The Bahía Blanca Estuary. Springer, Cham, pp.493-519. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66486-2_18.
Vivier, B.; Dauvin, J.C.; Navon, M.; Rusig, A.M.; Mussio, I.; Orvain, F.; Boutouil, M.; Claquin, P. 2021. Marine artificial reefs, a meta-analysis of their design, objectives and effectiveness. Global Ecology and Conservation, 27: e01538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01538.
Wang, Z.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, S.; Wang, K.; Zhao, J.; Xu, Q. 2015. A comparative study of ï¬Âsh assemblages near aquaculture, artiï¬Âcial and natural habitats Journal of Ocean University of China, 14(3): 1-12.
Whitmarsh, D.; Santos, M.N.; Ramos, J.; Monteiro, C.C. 2008. Marine habitat modification through artificial reefs off the Algarve (Southern Portugal): an economic analysis of the fisheries and the prospects for management. Ocean & Coastal Management, 51(6): 463-468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2008.04.004.
Yeasmin, S.; Rahman, K.F. 2012. 'Triangulation' Research Method as the Tool of Social Science Research. BUP Journal, 1(1): 154-163.
Zappes, C.A.; Oliveira, P.C.; Di Beneditto, A.P.M. 2016. Percepção de pescadores no Norte Fluminense sobre a viabilidade da pesca artesanal com a implantação de megaempreendimento portuário. Boletim do Instituto de Pesca, 42(1): 73-88. https://doi.org/10.5007/1678-2305.2016v42n1p73.
Downloads
Published
2022-06-03
Issue
Section
Scientific Article
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Boletim do Instituto de Pesca
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
