Performance of common snook and fat snook juveniles at different stocking densities in fresh water

Authors

  • Fernanda LIEBL Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
  • Hilton AMARAL-JUNIOR Campo Experimental de Piscicultura de Camboriú/EPAGRI
  • Silvano GARCIA Campo Experimental de Piscicultura de Camboriú/EPAGRI
  • Luís Ivan Martinhão SOUTO Instituto Federal Catarinense (IFC)
  • Cristina Vaz Avelar de CARVALHO Instituto Federal Catarinense (IFC)
  • Vinicius Ronzani CERQUEIRA Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20950/1678-2305.2016v42n1p145

Keywords:

centropomids, growth, net cage, temperature

Abstract

The objective of this experiment was to compare survival and growth of fat snook (Centropomus parallelus) and common snook (Centropomus undecimalis), reared in freshwater under different stocking densities. The experiment lasted 251 days. The fish were randomly distributed in cages (1 m x 1 m x 0.8 m), treatments in triplicate, placed inside an earthen pond located in Camboriu (SC). Water quality parameters were measured and were adequate for the species, except for the low temperatures (19.8 Â± 3.3 Â°C). Zootechnical parameters were analyzed by a two-way ANOVA (species x density). Concerning growth, total length and condition factor were significantly different between species, and specific growth rate was not significantly different between treatments (0.23% day-1). Nevertheless, there was a significant interaction of species and stocking density in relation to final weight (fat snook 42.4 Â± 16.8; 34.5 Â± 15.3 e 39.1 Â± 18.7 g; common snook 46.2 Â±18.3; 52.8 Â±22.6 e 46.4 Â±18.8 g; for 12.5; 25.0 and 37.5 fish m-³,respectively). Regarding survival, there was also a significantly difference between species (fat snook 90.0 ± 5.9% and common snook 66.3 ± 9.4%). Stocking density significantly affected biomass only (459 ± 74.5 g; 842 ± 100 g; 1,157 ± 293 g, in densities of 12.5; 25.0 e 37.5 fish m-³,respectively). Both species had a positive growth without a clear advantage for common snook, as expected.

Published

2016-03-30

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3 > >>