Planktonic and bentonic responses to different fertilizations in the Farfantepenaeus subtilis (Pérez-Farfante, 1967) shrimp culture

Authors

  • Werlanne Mendes de Santana Mestre pelo PPG-RPAq, UFRPE
  • Albino Leal Aluno do PPG-RPAq, UFRPE/Engenheira de Pesca
  • Werlayne Mendes de Santana Aluno do PPG-RPAq, UFRPE
  • Maria Zita Lúcio Engenheira de Pesca
  • Patrícia Fernandes de Castro Pesquisadora da Embrapa Meio-Norte
  • Eudes de Souza Correia Professor do Departamento de Pesca e Aq-­¼icultura, UFRPE http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9987-8854

Keywords:

F. subtilis, organic fertilizers, natural food

Abstract

This work aimed to evaluate the natural food induction in Farfantepenaeus subtilis culture, through different fertilization regimes. Twelve 500 L fiber glass tanks were stocked with 30 shrimps.m-2 (2.57 ± 1.27 g). Four experimental treatments were adopted in triplicate, using the three organic fertilizers: wheat bran í  FT (28 g.m-2), rice bran í  FA (28 g.m-2) and molasses í  ML (40 mL.m-2), and one control í  CT, with inorganic fertilizers (2 mg.L-1 nitrogen and 0.2 mg.L-1 phosphorus). Artificial feed was offered in feeding trays three times a day, and plankton, benthos and water samples were collected fortnightly. Results showed no significant difference (Pâ"°¥0.05) in survival among the organic fertilizers treatments, but showed statistical difference (P<0.05) between FT and CT. About the natural food organisms, there was no significant difference (Pâ"°¥0.05) among planktonic groups. In the phytoplankton, there was predominance of Cyanophyta, while in the zooplankton the major representants were rotifers. In the benthos, Cyanophyta also represented the phytobenthos, but there was statistical difference (P<0.05) only in Euglena group, in which FA was different (P<0.05) from FT and CT. In the zoobenthos it was registered the predominance of rotifers and nematodes, showing significant difference (P<0.05) in rotifers group in ML, when compared with CT and FT. Nematodes differed (P<0.05) in FA when related to FT and ML, which also predominated in mesobenthos, with no significant difference (Pâ"°¥0.05) among the treatments. It was concluded that in the experimental conditions adopted, both organic and inorganic fertilizers effects were similar related to natural food induction.

References

A.P.H.A./AW.W.A./W.E.F. 1995 Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 19ª ed.
Washington, A.P.H.A.

ALONSO-RODRIGUES, R. e PÁEZ-OSUNA, F. 2003 Nutrients, phytoplankton and hermful algal blooms in shrimp ponds: a review with special reference to the situation in the Gulf of California. Aquaculture, v. 219, p.317-336.

BARBIERI JR., R.C. e OSTRENSKY NETO, A. 2002 Camarões marinhos: Engorda. Viçosa, Aprenda Fácil, 370 p

BOLTOVSKOY, D. 1981 Atlas del zooplankton Del Atlí­¢ntico sudoccidental y métodos de trabajo com
el zooplancton marino. Mar Del Plata: INIDEP,791p.

BOYD, C.E. s.d. Manejo da qualidade da água na aquicultura e no cultivo do camarão marinho. Trad. Josemar
Rodrigues. Recife: ABCC, 157p.

BOYD, C.E. 1997 Manejo do solo e da qualidade da água em viveiros para aqüicultura. Departamento de
Aqüicultura Mogiana Alimentos, S.A. Campinas, SP. 55p.

BRUSCA, R. and BRUSCA, G. 2003 Invertebrates. 2ed.Sunderland: Sinauer Associates, Inc., 936p.

CAMPOS, S.S. 2005 Influência do farelo de trigo na disponibilidade do alimento natural e no crescimento do camarão Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone, 1931). Recife. 101p. (Dissertação de Mestrado em Recursos
Pesqueiros e Aqüicultura, Departamento de Pesca - UFRPE)

CORREIA, E.S. 1998 Influência da alimentação natural no cultivo semi-intensivo do camarão de água doce Macrobrachium rosenbergii (De Man, 1879). São Paulo. 136p. (Tese de Doutorado em Ciências í  UFSCar).

FELFí­–DY, L.; SZABO, E.; TOTH, L. 1987 A biológiai vizminosités. Budapeste: Vizugyi Hidrobiológia Vizdok, v. 160, 258p.

GOLTERMAN, H.J.; CLYMO, R.S.; OHNSTAD, M.AM. 1978 Methods for physical and chemical analysis of freshwaters. London: Blackwell Sci. Pub. p. 214.

KLEEREKOPER, H. 1990 Introdução ao estudo da limnologia. 2 ed. Porto Alegre: Ed. da UFRGS.p. 329.

KOROLEFF, F. 1976 Determinations od nutrientes. In: Grasshoff, K. (ed.) Methods of seawater snalysis.Verlag Chemie Weinhein. p. 117-187.

MADRID, R.M. 2005 A crise econômica da carcinicultura. Panorama da Aqüicultura, v.15, n. 90,p. 22-29, julho/agosto.

MACKERETH, F.J.H.; HERON, J.; TALLING, J.F. 1978 Water analysis: some revised methods for limnologists.
Scient. Public., London, n. 36. 121p.

MENDES, P.P. 1999 Estatí­­stica aplicada í­Â  aqüicultura.Recife: Bagaço. 265p

MISCHKE, C.C. e ZIMBA P.V. 2004 Plankton community responses in earthen channel catfish nursery ponds under various fertilization regimes.Aquaculture, v. 233, p. 219í 235.

NEWELL, G.E. e NEWELL, R.C. 1963 Marine plankton a practical guide. London: London Hutchison Educational, 221p.

NUSCH, E.A. 1988 Comparasion of diferent methods for chlorophyll and phaepigment determination.
Arch. Hydrobiol. Beih. Ergebn. Limnol., n. 14, p.14-36.

NUNES, A.J.P.; GODDARD, S.; GESTEIRA, T.C.V. 1996 Feeding activity patterns of the Southern brown shrimp Penaeus subtilis under semi-intensive culture in NE Brazil. Aquaculture, v. 144, p.371í 386.

NUNES, A.J.P.; GESTEIRA, T.C.V.; GODDARD, S. 1997 Food ingestion and assimilation by the Food ingestion and assimilation by the Southern brown shrimp Penaeus subtilis under semi-intensive culture in NE Brazil. Aquaculture,v. 149, p. 121-136.

NUNES, A.J.P. 2001 Alimentação para camarões marinhos í  Parte II. Panorama da Aqüicultura, Rio de Janeiro, v. 11, n. 63, p.23-33.

PEREIRA, R.C. e SOARES-GOMES, A. 2002 Biologia marinha. Rio de Janeiro: Interciência, 380p.

RUPPERT, E.E. e BARNES, R.D. 1996 Zoologia dos invertebrados. 6 ed. São Paulo: Roca, 1030 p.

SILVA, L.O.B. 2004 Utilização de nitrato de sódio em viveiros de camarão marinho. Recife. 45p. Dissertação
de Mestrado em Recursos Pesqueiros e Aqüicultura,Departamento de Pesca- UFRPE).

STREBLE, H. e KRAUTER, D. 1987 Atlas de los microorganismos de água dulce. Barcelona: Ediciones
Omega, 357 p.

VALENTI, W.C. 1998 Carcinicultura de Água doce. Tecnologia para produção de camarões. Brasí­­lia:IBAMA/FAPESP, 383 p.

WURTS, W.A. 2002 Alkalinity and hardness in production ponds. World Aquaculture, Baton Rouge, v. 33, n. 1, p.16-17.

ZAR, J.H. 1996 Biostatistical analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. 622p

Published

2018-10-31

Most read articles by the same author(s)